Berry, M. (2013). Computing in the National Curriculum. A Guide for Primary Teachers. Bedford, UK: Computing at School.

Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, (72)145-157. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020

Drake, S.M. (2014). Designing across the curriculum for “sustainable well-being”: A 21st century approach. In F. Deer, T. Falkenberg, B. McMillan, & L. Sims (Eds.), Sustainable well-being: Concepts, issues, and educational practice (pp. 57–76). Winnipeg, MB: Education for Sustainable Well-Being (ESWB) Press. Retrieved from:

Fullan, M. (2013). Great to excellent: Launching the next stage of Ontario’s education agenda. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Education. Retrieved from:

Gadanidis, G. (2012). Why can’t I be a mathematician? For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2), 20-26. Available at

Gadanidis, G. (2015a).  Coding as a Trojan Horse for Mathematics Education Reform. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(2), 155-173

Gadanidis, G. (2015b). Coding for Young Mathematicians. Western University.

Gao, X., & Grisham-Brown, J. (2011). The use of authentic assessment to report accountability data on young children’s language, literacy and pre-math competency. International Education Studies, 4(2), 41-53. Retrieved from

Graf, E. A., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Designing and developing assessments of complex thinking in mathematics for the middle grades. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 195. Retrieved from

Hargreaves, E. (1997). Mathematics assessment for children with english as an additional language. Assessment in Education, 4(3), 401-411. Retrieved from

Harlen, W., & Winter, J. (2004). The development of assessment for learning: Learning from the case of science and mathematics. Language Testing, 21(3), 390-408. doi:

Jeltova, I., Birney, D., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Making instruction and assessment responsive to diverse students’ progress: Group-administered dynamic assessment in teaching mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 381-95. Retrieved from

Kafai, Y.B., & Burke, Q. (2013).  Computer Programming Goes Back to School. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(1), 63-65, 2013

Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Put Your Robot In, Put Your Robot Out: Sequencing Through Programming Robots In Early Childhood. Journal Of Educational Computing Research, 50(4), 553-573. doi:10.2190/EC.50.4.f

Kazakoff, E., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. (2013). The Effect of a Classroom-Based Intensive Robotics and Programming Workshop on Sequencing Ability in Early Childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245-255. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5

Levine, R. (2009). Curriculum-based dynamic assessment emphasizing a triarchic model and language abilities: Examining the utility of this testing method in elementary school mathematics classrooms (Order No. 3349141). Available from ProQuest Education Journals. (305047877). Retrieved from

Liang, X. (2010). Assessment use, self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: Comparative analysis of PISA 2003 data of finland, canada and the USA. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(3), 213. Retrieved from

Misfeldt, M., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2015). Learning Mathematics Through Programming: An Instrumental Approach to Potentials and Pitfalls. In Proceedings of the 9th Congress of European Research

Morgan, C., Tsatsaroni, A., & Lerman, S. (2002). Mathematics teachers’ positions and practices in discourses of assessment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(3), 445-461. Retrieved from

Nguyen, D. M., Hsieh, Y. J., & Allen, G. D. (2006). The impact of web-based assessment and practice on students’ mathematics learning attitudes. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(3), 251-279. Retrieved from

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016).  21st Century Competencies: Foundation Document for Discussion Retrieved from:

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). The Ontario curriculum grades 1‐8: Mathematics.  Retrieved from

Papert, S. (1993) Turtle geometry: A mathematics made for learning. Chapter 3 in Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas.

Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernandez, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brenna, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silvername, B., Kafair, Y. (2009). “Digital Fluency” Should mean designing, creating, and remixing, not just browsing, chatting, and interacting. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67.

Sammon, K. B., Kobett, B., & al, e. (1992). Linking instruction and assessment in the mathematics classroom. The Arithmetic Teacher, 39(6), 11. Retrieved from

Smith, C. P., & Neumann, M. D. (2014). Scratch it out! Enhancing Geometrical Understanding. Teaching Children Mathematics, 21(3), 185-188.

Sneider, C., Stephenson, C., Schafer, B., & Flick, L. (2014). Exploring the science Framework and NGSS: Computational thinking in the science classroom. Science Scope, 38(3), 10-15.

Suurtamm, C., & Koch, M. J. (2014). Navigating dilemmas in transforming assessment practices: Experiences of mathematics teachers in ontario, canada. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(3), 263-287. doi:

Suurtamm, C., Koch, M., & Arden, A. (2010). Teachers’ assessment practices in mathematics: Classrooms in the context of reform. Assessment in Education, 17(4), 399. Retrieved from

Thomas, C. N., Van Garderen, D., Scheuermann, A., & Lee, E. J. (2015). Applying a universal design for learning framework to mediate the language demands of mathematics. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31(3), 207. Retrieved from

Wallace, M. (2011). Developing assessment practices: A study of the experiences of preservice mathematics teachers as learners and the evolution of their assessment practices as educators(Order No. 3499583). Available from ProQuest Education Journals. (944324214). Retrieved from

Watson, A. (2006). Some difficulties in informal assessment in mathematics. Assessment in Education, 13(3), 289-303. Retrieved from

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35

Yin, Y., Olson, J., Olson, M., Solvin, H., & Brandon, P. R. (2015). Comparing two versions of professional development for teachers using formative assessment in networked mathematics classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(1), 41-70. Retrieved from